General Announcement: We are unaffected by the Canada Post Strike.

The Price of Grace: Why the Sacred Isn’t Free


The first thing anyone notices about a handmade rosary is never the price. It’s the weight.
Glass, stone, metal—each bead has a small gravity, each knot holds a decision, each decade learns to sit in the palm like an animal that trusts you. I made one on the Solemnity of the Most Sacred Heart, and as soon as it left my hands I knew what questions would follow: How much? Why so much? Isn’t something sacred supposed to be a gift?

The moment you put a number beside devotion, people flinch.
Some flinch quietly—confused, disappointed, embarrassed to have wanted a holy thing that costs more than a keepsake. Others flinch out loud: If it’s about God, you shouldn’t charge for it. If it’s spiritual, shouldn’t it be free? Underneath is a softer accusation: that to price sacred work is to sell grace by the ounce.

Here is what I know in my bones: the expectation that sacred labor be unpaid isn’t holiness. It is exploitation in a halo.
It asks the maker to subsidize someone else’s access to meaning. It mistakes purity for poverty. It turns piety into a mechanism for getting craft below cost. The sacred may be priceless; the making never is.


Devotion Was Never Free

We didn’t always lie to ourselves about this.
Once, the most valued work a human could commission was sacred work. Reliquaries that gleamed like portable constellations. Icons layered with egg tempera and breath. Illuminated manuscripts whose margins burned with gold. Altarpieces that took years, sometimes lifetimes. None of it was free. It wasn’t meant to be. Patrons gave not to own holiness but to ensure the work could exist at all.

Payment then was not desecration. It was consecration of a different sort: money turned into hours turned into prayerful labor. A community pooled resources so a maker could sit at the bench through winter and spring, so the cloth could be woven, the pigment ground, the metal shaped. The “cost” was simply the truthful acknowledgment that devotion takes time, and time is human life measured out in days.

We forget this lineage because modern capitalism split the atom.
It cleaved devotion from craft, art from labor, maker from object—then told us that sacredness lives in another world where money is vulgar and craft is a hobby. We inherit that lie so thoroughly that when a living person names the price of their own hands, we feel scandalized. As if holiness were threatened by rent.


The Industrial Saints

When people say “rosary,” many imagine a plastic strand heat-molded by the thousand, offered in a basket at a church door with a sign that reads Take One. When they say “sacred jewelry,” they picture shrink-wrapped trinkets on a spinner rack next to the cash. When they open an online marketplace, they meet pages of “handmade” listings that are simply bulk imports reshot in soft light. A person trying to live by their craft enters this field already misread: everything looks cheap because everything is cheap—by design.

This is not an accident. It is an industry.
Religious wholesalers and mass-market suppliers exist to provide affordable devotional items at scale. There is nothing inherently evil about that. A teenager going to a retreat can take a free rosary and feel accompanied through a hard year. A parish can stock a gift shop. Mass production makes certain forms of comfort widely available.

But when the mass-made becomes the measure of the sacred, something critical breaks. The market trains us to see spiritual objects as sentiment with a low ceiling. It teaches us to expect holiness at the price of a greeting card. It hollows out the category of “devotional art” until it holds only slogans and chrome. Then it turns to the artisan who has just spent ten hours knotting cord and stitching a stone-hearted star and says, How dare you ask to be paid? We buy grace in blister packs and accuse the craftsperson of greed.

The truth is simpler and less flattering: the industrial saints—those smooth, frictionless products that look like faith—have made it hard to remember what lived devotion looks like when it comes dressed in the hours of a single human life.


The Violence of the Gift Economy

There is another story we tell to make ourselves feel generous. It goes like this: The sacred should be given. If money is ugly, let’s trade, barter, gift. Let’s live in the old ways, the “pure” ways, outside the cash nexus. Surely that is holier.

Sometimes it is. Sometimes two artists pass food and work and shelter between them with no ledger and call it survival. Sometimes a community knits itself through reciprocity so tight the rent collectors can’t pull it apart. I believe in that kind of gift.

But the romantic version of the gift economy has a blind spot the size of a mortgage.
It works best for those already cushioned by someone else’s cash—the person with stable housing, or the salaried partner, or the family safety net, or the parish stipend. It works until the pharmacy asks for payment, until the power company bills by the month, until the bus driver doesn’t accept a handmade bracelet for fare.

In a world priced in dollars, mandating barter for the most precarious among us is not idealism. It is active violence.

When you’re surrounded by people who only see the value of cash, expecting a person to perform some kind of socialist or communal ideal of “just trade and barter :)” is an act of cognitive dissonance so profound it becomes cruelty. It asks the vulnerable to live outside the system while still being crushed by it, to carry the purity myth so everyone else can feel clean.

Here is the harder naming: asking an independent maker of devotional art to “just trade” is a way of keeping their labor sacred only if it stays invisible. You want the hours, the prayer, the skill—the lived theology stitched into stone and string—but not the discomfort of meeting money with respect. You want to be soothed by purity while someone else counts coins in private. Call it what it is: sanctified extraction.


Reclaiming Payment as Reverence

Money is not the enemy of the sacred. Indifference is.
What someone pays for a handmade devotional piece is not the price of grace. It is the price of keeping a maker in the room long enough for grace to have somewhere to land.

When a person buys a one-of-a-kind rosary, they are not purchasing holiness like a product. They’re joining a chain of stewardship. They’re exchanging their resources for what the maker spent: time, attention, skill, intention, lifespan. The object is not a receipt for piety; it is an artifact of devotion’s cost—in hours, not just stones. The price honors that conversion.

Payment can be a sacrament of responsibility if we let it.
It says: I see what this took. I will not pretend it took less. I will help carry what it costs you to keep doing it. That is not crass. It is the minimum etiquette of reverence.

This is where artists and patrons both have work to do. Makers must speak plainly about process: the hours, the decisions, the sourcing, the refusal to copy. We must refuse to downplay what we know in order to make our work palatable. Patrons must learn to resist the reflex that equates low price with virtue. Sometimes the holiest thing you can do for a piece of sacred art is to pay for it without asking it to apologize.


Accounting for the Real

Let’s be concrete. A hand-beaded, heirloom rosary with a hand-stitched Sacred Heart star is not a trinket. It is mixed-discipline studio work—metals, textiles, design, beadwork, finishing—carried out with theological intent. Materials alone (stone, glass, sterling, cord strong enough to outlast a decade of prayer) cost more than mass-market retail. Add ten to twelve hours of concentrated making. Add prep, layout, rework, finishing. Add the intangible but real: creative lineage, devotional attention, the years it took to build the skill you now take for granted because the finished piece looks inevitable.

Even if a maker pays themselves a modest studio rate—less than many skilled trades—an honest price lands in the hundreds. That number isn’t audacity. It’s math.
And because some of us work by a studio ethic that refuses duplicates, there is no economy of scale waiting in the wings. Each piece must warrant its own existence, start to finish.

If you cannot afford such a piece, that is not a moral failure, and you are not being shamed. There are other ways to meet devotion: free rosaries at parishes, secondhand finds, making one yourself with guidance. Those paths are good. What you cannot do—what none of us should do—is tell a living craftsperson that their work is only holy if it costs them and not you.


The Pastoral Objection (Answered)

Sometimes the objection comes from sincere pastoral concern: What about the poor who need sacramentals? Didn’t you say the sacred shouldn’t be fenced? Yes. And. The answer is not to conscript independent artisans into unpaid production. Parishes and communities can buy from makers at fair prices and gift the objects onward. Collectives can subsidize commissions. Those with means can sponsor a piece for someone without. This is what patronage used to be before we collapsed every exchange into consumer bargain-hunting.

We know how to do this. We’ve just forgotten that generosity and payment were never enemies. They are partners when arranged with care.


Language, Cleaned of Guilt

We need a better script than the one that shames makers for surviving. Try this instead:

  • This is devotional art, not a mass product.
  • Each piece is composed by hand; no duplicates are made.
  • Payment sustains the practice that makes future pieces possible.
  • If you need a sacred object and cannot afford one, ask; if I cannot gift one, I will say so without apology.

Notice what that language refuses: the pretense of scarcity theater (“only three left!” when there are always three left), the demand for endless transparency about the maker’s private economics, the guilt-smudged apology for naming a price. It replaces them with clarity. Clarity is kinder than performance. Clarity is cleaner than shame.


What Buyers Are Really Buying

If you choose to buy a handmade sacred piece, here is the truth about what comes with it:

  • Durability. The intention that something survive beyond you.
  • Singularity. A design that won’t be double-printed at scale next month.
  • Transmission. A link in a chain of human skill that would otherwise vanish into an algorithm’s catalog.
  • Witness. The knowledge that your money turned into time in someone’s studio, which turned into an object that will outlast a season.

And—especially for those who pray with their hands—companionship. There is a difference between plastic molded by a machine and a string someone built while thinking about whether the bead should sit here or one step to the left. A difference you can feel in the dark.


What Makers Owe (and Don’t)

Makers owe the work our integrity and our best attention. We owe buyers honest materials, clear descriptions, fair policies. We owe ourselves prices that keep our bodies intact. We do not owe anyone conformity to an economy that despises the people who keep it running. We do not owe duplicates on request, or discounts to appease embarrassment, or public accounting for why we charged what we charged.

There is no sin in asking to live.


The Real Offering

I return to that Sacred Heart rosary—the one stitched star by star, decade by decade, built to be handled until the oils of a life give the beads their own gloss. The work of my hands is not grace; it is a home for it. The price does not buy holiness; it compensates the hours spent making a vessel worthy of being used.

The sacred isn’t free because it was never meant to be disposable.
To pay the maker is to acknowledge that devotion takes time, and time is the rarest material we have left. When you pay fairly, you do not sully the holy. You protect it. You keep it possible. You keep a craftsperson at the bench so the next person who needs something to hold while they pray finds it waiting, strong enough to be passed on.

I don’t sell grace.
I sell the hours it took to make a place where grace could land.

 If reflections like this speak to you, you can support independent, relational creative work — the kind that lives between prayer and poetry — through the Mutual Aid Fund or by exploring the Shop: Made by Me | Oddities & Convenience. If you’d like: you can follow us on Mediumitch.io or on ko-fi as well.

Leave a Comment

error: Artwork and images © the artist. Reuse requires a license. Support the work or inquire about licensing.