Every brochure swears there’s help if you need it. Every workplace poster smiles beside a hotline. Every government site has a dropdown labeled Emergency Supports. The language is clean, confidence-colored. Words like accessible, inclusive, no wrong door. If you believed the posters, you’d think the country was a long, soft net strung beneath the high wire of ordinary life.
I believed the posters. I believed the corporate wellness emails and the community bulletin boards in town and the websites with their cheerful serif fonts. I believed them because the alternative — that there is no net, only a story — was too frightening to look at for very long.
But the illusion only lasts until the first time you fall. From a rural kitchen table, the nearest “help” is a $60 taxi ride away on a good day, more if the driver decides the coming-and-going counts as two fares. The bus schedule is a rumor from some other town. The broadband is temperamental. The forms assume a printer. The voicemails assume a second phone. The deadline assumes your car didn’t die five years ago.
From a distance, care looks like a place you can knock and be let in. Up close, it looks like a glass door you can see through but never open. There are people on the other side, smiling and waving, mouthing we’re here for you. On this side of the glass, the wind is loud.
The myth of the safety net persists because it makes everyone feel better — those who write the policies, those who post the hotlines, and even those of us who whisper the hotline number to ourselves at night like a spell. But numbers are not doors. Posters are not hands. What exists instead is a maze of almosts: almost help, almost care, almost human.
Geography as Disqualification
The system assumes a city. It assumes that the body in distress can board a bus, tap a card, walk three blocks, sit under fluorescent lights among clipboards and wait for its name to be called. It assumes that “access” is a right angled hallway somewhere downtown.
Here, access is a weather report. If the roads are iced, there will be no session. If the taxi is busy, there will be no appointment. If your neighbor’s truck is in the shop, there will be no signature, no witnessed form, no proof of life. The distance is not scenic. The distance is a toll.
A single errand — pick up a document, update a file in person, sign something that must be “wet ink” — can swallow a day’s food budget. A $60 ride to town is not a round-trip when the driver charges for the privilege of finding your house. It’s a luxury purchase of a chance at support. “Access” becomes a commodity, sold by the kilometer. The system calls it eligibility. The map calls it no.
Even digital access is built like a city: portals that time out, video calls that freeze, verification texts that arrive a minute too late when you’re between two bars of signal. “Upload a PDF,” the portal says, as though scanners grow wild beside fence lines. “You can also mail it,” the portal says, as though anyone in crisis has stamps. When the system says inclusive, it means as long as you come to us.
No one writes it this way, of course. The cruelty is an emergent property of a thousand small assumptions: that you have a car, that your internet is fast, that your minutes aren’t prepaid, that you can be reached during office hours, that you can take a day off to be seen. Geography becomes disqualification. Not because help is malicious, but because help is far away and can’t imagine you exist.
The Bureaucracy of Abandonment
On paper, the state is a generous parent who just needs to see your report cards. In practice, it’s a clerk who asks to see inside your stomach. Prove hunger. Prove debt. Prove that you did not eat too well, that you did not work too much, that your poverty is pure.
The application begins with your name and ends somewhere near your dignity. Each month repeats the pilgrimage: a portal, a password, a phone queue, a request for documents that don’t exist in the form they want. When you finally reach a person, they speak in scripts. “I understand your frustration,” they say, voices flattened by a thousand identical calls. “Can you upload the bank statement in PDF?” “Can you provide a letter from your landlord?” “Can you return this form within five business days?”
What is never asked: Do you have a printer? Do you have a ride? Do you have the kind of calm that can survive this conversation without shaking? The system measures your need precisely so it can keep you just above catastrophe, which is to say, close enough to catastrophe to remain legible. Mending is not part of the mandate. Managing is.
Abandonment here is not dramatic. It’s clerical. A caseworker who leaves, a file that changes hands, a decision delayed for nine weeks while you wait by a phone with a dead battery because you can’t afford to miss the call that will determine whether you eat. There is no villain at the center, only a doctrine: we will help you as long as helping you never burdens us.
The forms do not say this. They say client-centered. They say trauma-informed. They say equity. But every checkbox is a warning: we will believe you only if your life fits on a line.
The Marketed Compassion of Workplaces
Employers love the look of care. They love the teal ribbons and the wellness modules and the Employee Assistance Program pamphlets stacked beside the microwave. They love Mental Health Awareness Month content calendars and the climate-controlled language of “resilience.”
The help on offer is always time-limited and reputation-priced. Six sessions, if you can attend them on your own time. A hotline staffed by people who will verify your identity twice and then read you a list of nearby resources that you cannot reach. A supervisor who will grant you a day off if you’re willing to name the wound in an email that goes to HR. Every concession arrives with a ledger. Ask too often and you become a liability. Ask too precisely and you become a story people trade in the break room.
The irony is structural: to access help, you must admit to being unproductive; to admit to being unproductive is to risk your place. So the system tells you to self-advocate while penalizing advocacy. It invites you to be vulnerable inside a building where vulnerability is a performance review category.
Meanwhile, the posters remain. Bright colors, inclusive silhouettes, QR codes promising breathing exercises. Wellness becomes brand hygiene, a way to keep the company clean. The building smells like lavender. The work smells like fear.
The people who hang the posters are usually kind. They really do want you to feel supported. But the institution they serve is allergic to costs not backed by revenue. Your wellbeing is a line item with a ceiling. Compassion is capped.
Conditional Community
Outside of institutions — workplaces, ministries — the word community is supposed to mean something softer. It’s supposed to be the circle that catches you when the official routes fail. In queer circles, in activist spaces, in support groups, the promise is come as you are. The reality is come as you are, but tidy.
There is a sanctioned volume for pain. If you exceed it, you are “too much.” There is a dress code for suffering, too; it looks a certain way, speaks a certain language, cites certain authors, performs the appropriate contrition. Rural poverty does not photograph well. Trauma that smells like dishes in the sink and cab fares and people who don’t talk is not romantic. It does not trend. It does not uplift. It is boring and real and unshareable.
In many spaces, inclusion is aesthetic. The right tags, the right disclaimers, the right formulations of accountability. These things matter, but they can turn care into liturgy — beautiful, and also a test. When you fail the test, exile is quiet: unanswered messages, a missing invitation, a sense that people are looking through you to an easier cause.
“Chosen family” can reproduce the same bargains as the family you came from: loyalty traded for performance, affection rationed to the photogenic, emergency help doled in the currency of social capital. The people in these circles are not villains. They are tired, too. They are performing survival with one eye on the room, hoping to be chosen back.
But when you show up with uncurated need, you learn quickly that “community care” has terms and conditions. And when you decline to perform your pain for the audience, because you live with people who would punish the performance, the algorithm cannot see you. Invisible, you remain unhelped.
The Therapy Economy
Therapy is medicine in a market. In a just world, care would be a commons; in this one, it’s a subscription with free trials. Six sessions through an assistance program, if you can schedule them between work and the evening bus that does not come. Ten sessions through a clinic grant that expires in March. If you want after, pay. If you want advocacy, pay more.
The therapist may be compassionate, brilliant, a lantern in the fog. But if you cannot reach their office without paying for the ride with your grocery money, the light is academic. If your session ends with a resource list that assumes you can spend an hour on hold, the light is ornamental. You are told to “reach out.” You learn the cost of reaching.
Some clinics will do video calls, but trauma doesn’t always travel over shaky bandwidth. Some insist on in-person intake. Some ask for a family doctor’s referral, a rare bird in rural air. Many are booked two months ahead. For people in cities, these obstacles are inconvenient. For people out here, they are absolute.
When help exists only as a commodity, your pain becomes an actuarial question: can you budget for healing? And when you cannot, you are told to “self-care,” a phrase that has come to mean make do. Stretch, breathe, drink water, accept. You become your own clinician, caseworker, and chaplain. You set your own bones. The fractures heal, but not straight.
Digital Idealism and the Performance of Revolution
Online, there are people building better worlds in threads. They write manifestos and mutual-aid guides and lists of resources. They are sincere, furious, hopeful. They raise money and awareness. They say no one is disposable.
But even in radical spaces, there is a whitelist of acceptable mess. If your struggle interfaces poorly with the performance of revolution, you may be encouraged to heal in private before you speak in public. If your conditions are too chaotic, too rural, too material to be incorporated cleanly into a theory, you become a footnote. The ideology loves the people. It loves them most when they are clean enough to quote.
Purity culture isn’t just about morality; it’s about presentation. Say the right words, in the right tone. Don’t embarrass the cause by being visibly unwell. Don’t complicate the narrative with your inconvenient geography, your slow internet, your inability to attend the meeting in the city where strategy becomes policy.
The hardest lesson of digital radicalism is that it replicates the structures it condemns: a center and a margin, a stage and a back door, a public of the saved and a vestibule for those not yet presentable. Real solidarity is stubborn and local. It shows up with casseroles and childcare and rides. It does not insist that you become easier first.
The Trap of Visibility
To be helped, you must be seen. To be seen, you must say what is wrong. But where I live, saying what is wrong is not neutral. It is transmissible. In small towns, confidentiality is an aspiration. In some families, vulnerability is a liability that will be used in the next argument, the next silence, the next cutting glance across a kitchen table.
Online, visibility turns trauma into content. The platforms want your wound in landscape mode. The crowds want catharsis that fits a caption. Share too much and you are a spectacle. Share too little and you are ignored. Share precisely and you risk the people in your house finding it and punishing you for the fact of your pain.
So you learn to keep the lid on. You call it privacy, but really it’s self-defense. You modulate yourself to survive the room you live in. The result looks like apathy from the outside. People say, Why didn’t you reach out? You calculate the price of reaching and decide to wake up again tomorrow instead.
The paradox is airtight: to be helped, you must expose yourself; exposure is dangerous; therefore, help is dangerous. People who have never had to do this math imagine that you are refusing kindness. They don’t understand that you are refusing harm.
The Ledger of the Left Behind
Here is what systemic abandonment looks like in a life, stated without sobbing, without metaphor, without plea:
- Thirty-one years old with no driver’s license because lessons require money and a car and a teacher who won’t sneer, because practice requires a parking lot that isn’t an hour away, because every attempt ran up against someone else’s anger or schedule or indifference; because fear coats the throat after too many rides with people who treated your body like cargo.
- No savings because every crisis arrives with a toll booth — lost hours, taxi fees, quietly paying for the privilege of trying to get help that doesn’t arrive.
- No local community because “community” is a church you don’t attend and a bar you don’t drink in and a network of families that regard you as a rumor, because the people who might understand you moved away, because the people who stayed learned to be small to keep the peace.
- Work you built yourself because no one would build it with you. A studio on a shoestring. A publishing venture that is mostly paperwork and will and the long, patient work of making something out of internet dust.
- A nervous system trained to scan the room for weather, to interpret silence as a storm warning, to swallow the part of you that wants to take up space.
- A ledger of receipts from systems that say they’re humane: the taxi ride to the clinic you couldn’t afford, the printed form you had to ask a stranger to help with, the hotline that put you on hold until your battery died, the office that told you to come back with proof that you exist.
The point of this list is not pity. It is inventory. If the net worked, it would not look like this. If the net worked, your survival would not be considered proof that everything is fine. If the net worked, I wouldn’t know the exact smell of failure at 8:30 on a weekday morning when the call center opens and the line is already full.
The Unbroken Ones
It is tempting to end with hope because hope photographs well. It is more honest to end with sovereignty. I am still here not because the net caught me, but because I learned how to land without it. I am still building because building is the only answer I have to the quiet arithmetic of abandonment. The work is small, local, stubborn. It is a shop page with five items and alt text. It is an essay in a private hall. It is a schedule taped beside a kettle. It is the soft discipline of not collapsing when collapse would be rational.
I do not offer this as a triumph narrative. I offer it as evidence. If I am still here, it is not proof that the system works. It is proof that it never mattered to the system whether I did. It is proof that those of us left outside the boulevard of help have made other roads.
The illusion of care will survive me. There will be new posters and new portals and refreshed language on the websites. There will be campaigns and months and themes. Some of them will do good for people close enough to reach the door. I will not begrudge that. But I will remember the glass.
Those of us who fall through every net learn to weave in the dark. We do not become softer. We become precise. We remember names and dates and the cost of a ride to town. We keep ledgers that no one will audit. We get up. We do the day. We go on building our lives in the space the system forgot to survey.
If one day this essay is read by someone who recognizes themselves in the cab fare and the silence, I want them to know that being unhelped is not a moral condition. It is not a cosmic verdict on your worth. It is a function of design. You did not fail to meet the standard of deserving. The standard failed to meet you where you live.
We were never caught by the net because the net was never meant to hold us. Here, outside its radius, we are not ruined. We are unbroken in the way of things that learned to root in wind. If the world wants to call that resilience, it may. I prefer another word: real.
If reflections like this speak to you, you can support independent creativity through the Mutual Aid Fund or by exploring the Shop: Made by Me | Oddities & Convenience. If you’d like: you can follow us on Medium, itch.io, or on ko-fi as well.